In the year or so that I have been a member of this forum I remember reading on more than one occasion of someone having a flute with a voice that was not right~too buzzy or too soft or not tuned or ....
Often these flutes have been in the hands of someone who was/is fairly new to the flute and often times these flutes were shed from their collection one way or another or modified to conform.
I wonder how many of these flutes would have been treasured by collectors in the future as FBS (Flutes Before Standardization)
For some this may not be important and I respect that relationship. I have made the effort to see the value/purpose in all of the flutes I have as they have been made. I have very few flutes made by other makers. A few of these I have had for quite a long time. There are some that just boggle my mind in terms of tuning/playability etc. But they were made this way and as such they have purpose.
In a thread about Anasazi flutes Kat mentioned a disruption in continuity (due to drought/conflict) when speaking about not having exact knowledge about how the flutes construction/finger placement was handed down. Consequently not much intact info about what an Anasazi flute was really like. I may not have interpreted this correctly so Kat please re-direct if needed.
With the resurgence of interest in this flute continuing to grow what can we do to maintain an accurate record for the future?
Penni Thanks for asking your question about sanding and please know that these questions I am asking are not a hidden way for me to say you are doing something that you should not.

